Cognición corporeizada, situada y extendida: una revisión sistemática

Jorge Emiro Restrepo

Resumen


Embodied, situated and extended cognition: a systematic review

Resumen

Artículo presenta resultado de una revisión en torno a tres perspectivas alternativas a la perspectiva tradicional de la cognición: la cognición corporeizada, la cognición situada y la cognición extendida, orientada a invitar a los investigadores en esta área (psicólogos, filósofos, antropólogos, educadores, neurocientíficos, entre otros) a considerar y estudiar formas alternas de encarar el fenómeno cognitivo. Para cada una de las tres perspectivas alternativas se exponen la teoría, los conceptos y algunos ejemplos de estudios empíricos que validan esas propuestas mediante una investigación bibliográfica sustentada en algunos de los principales libros y artículos en esta área. Este ejercicio analítico y hermenéutico estuvo ajustado a la metodología de la investigación documental.  

 

Palabras clave: cognición corporeizada, cognición situada, cognición extendida.

 


Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Adams, F., Aizawa, K. (2008). The bounds of cognition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Alibali, M. W., Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Evidence From Learners’ and Teachers’ Gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.611446

Ambrosini, E., Costantini, M. (2017). Body posture differentially impacts on visual attention towards tool, graspable, and non-graspable objects. Journal of Experimental Psycholo¬gy: Human Perception and Performance, 43(2), 360-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000330

Anderson, J. R. (2015). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. New York: Worth Publishers.

Baddeley, A. D., Woodhead, M. (1982). Depth of processing, context, and face recognition. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 36(2), 148-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0080635

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11301525

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.

Bartra, R. (2014). Antropología del cerebro. La conciencia y los sistemas simbólicos. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Beer, R. D. (2014). Dynamical Systems and Embedded Cognition. En: K. Frankish y W. Ramsey (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 128-148). Cambridge University Press.

Bennett, M. R., Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.

Brighton., H., Todd, P. M. (2009). Situating Rationality. Ecologically Rational Decision Ma¬king with Simple Heuristics. En: P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge Han¬dbook of Situated Cognition (pp. 322-350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, J., Collins, A., Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032

Cain, M. J. (2015). The Philosophy of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Calbi, M., Heimann, K., Barratt, D., Siri, F., Umiltà, M. A., Gallese, V. (2017). How Context Influences Our Perception of Emotional Faces: A Behavioral Study on the Kuleshov Effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1684. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01684

Carello, C., Grosofsky, A., Reichel, F.D., Solomon, H. Y., Turvey, M. T. (1989). Visually percei¬ving what is reachable. Ecological Psychology, 1(1), 27-54. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0101_3

Carroll, N. (ed.). (1993). Toward a theory of point-of-view editing: communication, emotion, and the movies. En: N. Carroll (Ed.). Theorizing the Moving Image (125–138), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carruthers, G. (2008). Types of body representation and the sense of embodiment. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(4), 1302–1316. 10.1016/j.concog.2008.02.001

Casasanto, D. (2011). Different bodies, different minds: the body specificity of language and thought. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 378-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422058

Charness, G., Sutter, M. (2012). Groups make better self-interested decisions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(3), 157-176. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.26.3.157

Clark, A., Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7-19. 10.1093/analys/58.1.7

Clark, A. (1999). Estar ahí: cerebro, cuerpo y mundo en la nueva ciencia cognitiva. Barcelona: Paidós.

Clark, A. (2003). Natural born ciborgs: minds, technologies, and the future of human intelli-gence. New York: Oxford University Press.

Coello, Y. (2005). Spatial context and visual perception for action. Psicologica, 26(1), 39-59. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ844414

Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws. Scandinavian Journal Psycho¬logy, 22(4), 267-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1981.tb00402.x

Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cogni¬tion, 106(2), 1047-1058. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.010

Crane, T. (2016). The Mechanical Mind: A Philosophical Introduction to Minds, Machines and Mental Representation. New York, NY: Routledge.

Curşeu, P. L., Jansen, R. J. G., Chappin, M. M. H. (2013). Decision Rules and Group Ratio-nality: Cognitive Gain or Standstill? PLoS ONE, 8(2), e56454 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056454

Dijkstra, K., Kaschak, M. P., Zwaan, R. A. (2007). Body posture facilitates retrieval of autobio¬graphical memories. Cognition, 102(1), 139-149. 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.009

Elías, N. (1995). Sociología fundamental. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Foglia, L., Wilson, R. A. (2013). Embodied Cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 4(3), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1226

Fusaroli, R., Gangopadhyay, C., Tylén, K. (2013). The dialogically extended mind: Language as skilful intersubjective engagement. Cognitive Systems Research, 29-30, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.06.002

Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shape the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gallagher, S. (2009). Philosophical Antecedents of Situated Cognition. En: P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (pp. 35-51). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gardner, H. (1985). The mind´s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.

Gigerenzar, G. (2008). Decisiones instintivas: la inteligencia del inconsciente. Barcelona: Edi¬torial Ariel.

Godden, D. R., Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environ¬ments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66(3), 325-31. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01468.x

Grafton, S. T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M. A. & Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Premotor Cortex Activation during Observation and Naming of Familiar Tools. Neuroimage, 6(4), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1997.0293

Guthrie, L. G., Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2015). Interactivity and mental arithmetic: Coupling mind and world transforms and enhances performance. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 41(54), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2015-0019

Held, R., Hein, A. (1963). Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56(5), 872-876. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0040546

Huang, K., Lubin, I. A., Ge, X. (2011). Situated learning in an educational technology course for pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(8), 1200-1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.06.006

Hutchins, E. (1990). The Technology of Team Navigation. En: J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Coopera¬tive Work (pp. 191-221). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Jacobs, G. M., Power, M. A., Loh, W. I. (2002). The teacher’s sourcebook for cooperative learning: practical techniques, basic principles and frequently asked questions. Thou¬sand Oaks: Corwin Press.

John-Steiner, V., Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural Approaches to Learning and Development: A Vygotskian Framework. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1996.9653266

Jonassen, D. H., Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cog-nitive tools. En D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communica-tions and technology (pp. 693-719). New York: Macmillan.

Keil, F. C. (1998). Cognitive science and the origins of thought and knowledge. En: W. Damon y R. M. Lerner. (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology (5th ed.): Volume 1: Theoretical Models of Human Development (pp. 341-413). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Kirsh, D. (2009). Problem Solving and Situated Cognition. En: P. Robbins y M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (pp. 264-306). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kugler, T., Kausel, E. E., Kocher, M. G. (2012). Are groups more rational than individuals? A review of interactive decision making in groups. WIREs Cognitive Science, 3(4), 471- 482. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1184

Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (2005). Metáforas de la vida cotidiana. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.

Lesher, J. H. (1994). The emergence of philosophical interest in cognition. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 12, 1-34. https://philpapers.org/rec/LESTEO-2

Lin, L. (2015). Exploring Collaborative Learning: Theoretical and Conceptual Perspectives. En: L. Lin, Investigating Chinese HE EFL Classrooms. Using Collaborative Learning to Enhance Learning (pp. 11-28). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Luria, A. R. (1997). Desarrollo histórico de los procesos cognitivos. Madrid: Akal.

Madan, C. R., Singhal, A. (2012). Using actions to enhance memory: effects of enactment, gestures, and exercise on human memory. Frontiers in. Psychology, 3, 507. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2012.00507

Malafouris, L. (2008). At the Potter’s Wheel: An Argument for Material Agency. En: C. Kna¬ppett y L. Malafouris (Eds), Material Agency Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach (pp. 19-36). New York: Springer.

Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Mansour, O. (2009). Group Intelligence: a distributed cognition perspective. International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems. Recuperado de: ht-tps://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ef54/012646e09d482b819d92574e8db2b8dcea00.pdf

Marcus, G. (2010). Kluge: la azarosa construcción de la mente humana. Madrid: Ariel.

Maturana, H. (2002). La objetividad. Un argumento para obligar. Santiago de Chile: Dolmen.

Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 141-144. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9

Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Noë, A. (2010). Fuera de la cabeza: por qué no somos el cerebro y otras lecciones sobre la biología de la conciencia. Barcelona: Editorial Kairós.

Özüdoğru, M., Özüdoğru, F. (2017). The Effect of Situated Learning on Students' Vocational English Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(11), 2037-2044. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1159747

Poirier, P. (2008). Evolutionary embodied cognitive science. En: B. Hardy-Vallée y N. Payette (Eds.), Beyond the brain: Embodied, situated and distributed cognition (pp. 29–46). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Proffitt, D. R. (2013). An Embodied Approach to Perception: By What Units Are Visual Perceptions Scaled? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(4), 474-483. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613489837

Proffitt, D. R. (2016). Embodied Perception and the Economy of Action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00008.x

Proffitt, D. R., Bhalla, M., Gossweiler, R., Midgett, J. (1995). Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 409-428. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210980

Rammert, W. (2008). Where the action is: distributed agency between humans, machines, and programs. Technology Studies working paper, TUTS-WP-4-2008. Technische Universität, Berlin, Germany. Disponible en: https://www.ts.tu- berlin.de/fileadmin/fg226/TUTS/TUTS_WP_4_2008.pdf

Restrepo, J. E. (2009). La mente desencarnada: consideraciones históricas y filosóficas sobre la psicología cognitiva. Psicología desde el Caribe, 24, 59-90. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa

Riskind, J. H. (1983). Nonverbal expressions and the accessibility of life experience memo-ries: A congruence hypothesis. Social Cognition, 2(1), 62-86. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1521/soco.1983.2.1.62

Robbins, P., Aydede, M. (2009). A Short Primer on Situated Cognition. En: P. Robbins y M. Aydede (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (pp. 3-10). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rochat, P., Wraga, M. (1997). An account of the systematic error in judging what is rea-chable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 199-212. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9090152

Rogoff, B., Lave, J. (Eds.), (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Russ, M. O., Mack, W., Grama, C. R., Lanfermann, H., Knopf, M. (2003). Enactment effect in memory: evidence concerning the function of the supramarginal gyrus. Experimental Brain Research, 149(4), 497-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1398-4

Shapiro, L. (2011). Embodied cognition. New York: Routledge.

Shapiro, L. (2014). When is cognition embodied? En: U. Kriegel, Current controversies in philosophy of mind (pp. 73-90). New York: Routledge.

Spencer, J. P., Perone, S., Johnson, J. S. (2009). Dynamic Field Theory and Embodied Cognitive Dynamics. En: J. P. Spencer (Ed.), Toward a Unified Theory of Development Connectionism and Dynamic System Theory Re-Consider (pp. 86-118). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sterelny K. (2010). Minds: extended or scaffolded? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 465-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9174-y

Thomas, L. E.,Lleras, A. (2007). Moving eyes and moving thought: On the spatial compa-tibility between eye movements and cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(4), 663-668. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196818

Thomas, L. E., Lleras, A. (2009). Swinging into thought: Directed movement guides insight in problem solving. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(4), 719-723. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.719

Tulving, E., Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352-373. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0020071

Tylén, K., Fusaroli, R., Bjørndahl, J. S., Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., Østergaard, S., Stjernfelt, F. (2015). Diagrammatic Reasoning: abstraction, interaction, and insight. Pragmatics and Cognition., 22(2), 263-281. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.2.06tyl

van Gelder, T. J., Port, R. (1995). It's about time: An overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. En R. Port & T. van Gelder (Ed.), Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition (pp. 1-43). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. En: B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 923-929. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.923

Wilson, N. L., Gibbs, R. W. (2007). Real and Imagined Body Movement Primes Metaphor Comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 721-731. https://doi.org/10.1080/15326900701399962

Yeh, W. & Barsalou, L. W. (2006). The situated nature of concepts. The American Journal of Psychology, 119(3), 349–384. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20445349

Yu, C., Smith, L. B., Shen, H., Pereira, A. F., Smith, T. (2009). Active Information Selection: Visual Attention Through the Hands. IEEE Transactions On Autonomous Mental Deve¬lopment, 1(2), 141-151. http://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2009.2031513




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25057/25005731.1100

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.

Comentarios sobre este artículo

Ver todos los comentarios




KATHARSIS

ISSN IMPRESO: 0124-7816  ISSN ELECTRONICO: 2500-5731

https://doi.org/10.25057/issn.2500-5731

katharsis@iue.edu.co  Facebook: PublicacionesIUE

Institución Universitaria de Envigado
Cra. 27 B # 39 A Sur 57
Envigado Colombia
PBX: 339 10 10 - Fax (574) 333 01 48

Latindex y Fuente Académica Premier de EBSCO

La Revista Katharsis está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional

 

 

La revista Katharsis sigue la politica de acceso abierto, libre de costo e inmediato a sus contenidos bajo el principio de hacer disponible gratuitamente la investigación al público, lo cual fomenta un mayor intercambio de conocimiento global. La revista permite a los lectores a descargar, imprimir, compartir y utlizar el contenido de textos publicados en cualquiera de sus numeros, con la condicion de una adecuada referenciacion de la fuente original. 
La revista no realiza ningun cobro economico por someter, revisar, correguir, editar, diagramar y publicar articulos en cualquiera de sus numeros. 



The Katharsis magazine follows the policy of open access, free of cost and immediate access to its contents under the principle of making research available to the public. The magazine allows readers to download, print, share and use the content of texts published in any of its numbers, under the condition of an adequate reference of the original source. The magazine does not make any economic charge to submit, review, correct, edit, diagram and publish articles in any of its numbers.


 

 Resultado de imagen para IMAGEN DIALNET      Resultado de imagen para IMAGEN REDIBResultado de imagen para IMAGEN EBSCOResultado de imagen para IMAGEN LATINDEX