Reasons of equity of privilege parents as beneficiaries in the survivor's pension in circumstances of economic dependence and manifest weakness due to the affectation of the minimum vital in Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25057/2500672X.1115Keywords:
Beneficiaries, Economic dependency, Equity, Living minimum, Survivors’ pension, Social securityAbstract
In Colombia, the current exclusive order of surviving pension beneficiaries is based on kinship (consanguinity, affinity and civil relationship) regardless of subjective criteria such as old age, disability and poverty. In contrast to the social reality of the country, this normative provision would seriously harm the constitutional right to the vital minimum of parents who were economically dependent on their deceased child, since upon his death his contributions cease, therefore, a situation of manifest weakness regarding their subsistence and the impossibility of attending with the children, spouse and/or permanent partner of the deceased categorized as preferential beneficiaries in ownership of the survivors' pension. Accordingly, this article aims to formulate a regulatory initiative that grants preference or legal concurrence for the benefit of the parents, with respect to the spouse, permanent partner or children of the deceased regarding the survivor's pension, in application of the principle of equity, the right to human dignity, the vital minimum, a possibility conceived within the special norms of social security of the military forces, in our Internal Regime.
Author Biographies
Lina Morales Quintero, Lina Morales Quintero
Abogada, Especialista en Derecho Laboral y Seguridad Social de la Institución Universitaria de Envigado
Maria Antonia Laverde Zuluaga, Institución Universitaria de Envigado
Lawyer, Specialist in Labor Law and Social Security, Institución Universitaria de Envigado.
Paola Garcia Aguirre, Institución Universitaria de Envigado
Lawyer, Specialist in Labor Law and Social Security, Institución Universitaria de Envigado.
References
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de Colombia. (1991, 4 de julio). Constitución Política de la República de Colombia. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/constitucion_politica_1991.html
Congreso de la República de Colombia. (1993, 23 de diciembre de 1993). Ley 100 de 1993. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0100_1993.html
Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2003, 29 de enero de 2003). Ley 797 de 2003. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0797_2003.html
Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2004, 30 de diciembre). Ley 923 de 2004. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0923_2004.html
Consejo de Estado de Colombia. (2006, 19 de octubre). Sentencia 042704. Subsección B Sección Segunda Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo [C. P.: Lemos Bustamante, J. M.].
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (1992, 24 junio). Sentencia T-426 de 1992 [M. P.: Cifuentes Muñoz, E.]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1992/T-426-92.htm
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (1993, 2 de mayo). Sentencia T-190 de 1993 [M. P.: Cifuentes Muñoz, E.]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1993/t-190-93.htm
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (1998, 22 de septiembre). Sentencia T-518 de 1998 [M. P.: Cifuentes Muñoz, E.]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1998/T-518-98.htm
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2001, 28 de noviembre 2001). Sentencia C-1255 de 2001. [M. P.: Uprimmy Yepes, R.]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2001/c-1255-01.htm#:~:text=Sentencia%20C%2D1255%2F01&text=La%20Corte%20recuerda%20que%20si,Corporaci%C3%B3n%20pueda%20pronunciarse%20de%20fondo.
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2002, 18 de abril). Sentencia T-281 de 2002 [M. P.: Cepeda Espinosa, M. J.]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2002/t-281-02.htm
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2006, 22 de febrero de 2006). Sentencia C-111 de 2006 [M. P.: Escobar Gil, R.]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2006/C-111-06.htm#:~:text=Sentencia%20C%2D111%2F06&text=El%20principio%20de%20solidaridad%20exige,en%20el%20cual%20se%20encuentren.
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2009, 19 de marzo). Sentencia T-184 de 2009 [M. P.: Henao Pérez, J. C.]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2009/T-184-09.htm
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2013, 5 junio de 2013). Sentencia T-326 de 2013 [M. P.: Vargas Silva, L. E.]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2013/T-326-13.htm
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2016, 4 de marzo). Sentencia T-113 de 2016 [M. P.: Guerrero Pérez, L. G.]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/t-113-16.htm
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2016, 25 agosto). Sentencia T-456 de 2016 [M. P.: Linares Cantillo, A.]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2016/t-456-16.htm
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2017, 28 de agosto de 2017). Sentencia T-548 de 2017 [M. P.: Ortiz Delgado, G. S.]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2017/t-548-17.htm
Corte Constitucional de Colombia. (2022, 26 de mayo). Sentencia T-176 de 2022 [M. P.: Reyes Cuartas, J. F.]. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2022/T-176-22.htm
Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia. (2016, 13 de abril). Radicado 48064, SL 6390 [M. P.: Dueñas Quevedo, C. C.]. https://www.cortesuprema.gov.co/corte/wp-content/uploads/relatorias/la/bago2016/SL6390-2016.pdf
Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia. (2019, 27 de noviembre). Radicado 72610. SL-5605 [M. P.: Castillo Cadena, F.]
Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia. (2020, 14 de abril). SL1393 de 2020 [M. P.: Restrepo Ochoa, O. d. J.]
Corte Suprema de Justicia de Colombia. (2022, 31 de mayo). SL2151-2022 [M. P.: Brito Cuadrado, S. R.]. https://cortesuprema.gov.co/corte/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/SL2151-2022-1-1.pdf
Presidencia de la República de Colombia (2004, 31 de diciembre). Decreto 4433 de 2004. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=15584
Rojas Arias, J. (2017). Delimitación del concepto de equidad en la Constitución Política de 1991. Análisis de fundamentación jurisprudencial y de análisis económico del derecho. Revista Con-texto, 47, 11-39. https://doi.org/10.18601/01236458.n47.03
Torres Tarazona, L. A. (2021, 19 de enero). Ampliación de la cobertura de la pensión de sobrevivientes a los beneficiarios. Ámbito Jurídico. https://www.ambitojuridico.com/noticias/columnista-online/ampliacion-de-la-cobertura-de-la-pension-de-sobrevivientes-los
Villamizar-Villamizar, M. (2017). El derecho a la pensión de sobrevivientes en las familias de crianza en Colombia [trabajo de Grado, Universidad Católica de Colombia]. Repositorio Ucatolica. http://hdl.handle.net/10983/15019
How to Cite
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nuevo Derecho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors should declare that the article is an original work that has not been totally or partially published in any print or electronic media, which has not been submitted simultaneously to another publication and that is not currently under evaluation in another publication. On the other hand, I leave (we) evidence that the statements made therein are the sole responsibility of the / the authors / is.
All data and references to already published material are properly identified with their respective credit and included in the bibliographical notes and appointments that stand out as such and, in cases that require it, I have the proper authorizations for those with the respective rights; in case of any dispute or claim relating to intellectual property rights, we take responsibility exonerating responsibility to Nuevo Derecho.
If the article is approved for publication, the authors transfer the copyright to the journal New law to publish, distribute electronic copies and included in indexing services, directories or databases of national and international data on Open Access under the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial (CC bY-NC-SA) by which the authors retain their copyrights and allow them to others copy and distribute your work provided they recognize the corresponding authorship and the work is not used for purposes commercial.
Therefore, new law does not retain the rights to reproduce or copy (copyright), so the authors will have the final versions, to disseminate them in institutional repositories, personal blogs or any other electronic or print media, with the sole condition to make mention of the original source of publication, in this case Nuevo Derecho.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
