Analysis of the materialization of the land restitution judgments in the city of Montería

Authors

  • Daniela Orozco Poveda Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4627-4608
  • Mariam Margarita Castaño Maza Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana
  • María Paulina Cogollo Anaya Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25057/2500672X.1355

Keywords:

Land Restitution, forced displacement, dispossession, integral reparation, Sentences
Abstract Authors References How to Cite

Abstract

Land has been a problematic point in the internal armed conflict in Colombia due to the absence of property titles and the informal management of rural areas, added to the issue of land concentration. Accordingly, the Law 1448 of 2011 has considered the integral reparation of those who were recognized as victims from an approach centered on their return to the dispossessed territory. In the present we will analyze the materialization of the verdicts proffered from the law of land restitution and its application in Montería, taking as a representative community of Cedro Cocido.

 

Author Biographies

Daniela Orozco Poveda, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana

  • Lawyer, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Seccional Montería.
  • Master in Law, Universidad de Medellín.
  • PhD student in Political and Legal Studies, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín.
  • Research professor of the COEDU Group of the Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Seccional Montería. daniela.orozcop@upb.edu.co

Mariam Margarita Castaño Maza, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana

  • Law student at Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Seccional Montería. mariamcastanomaza@gmail.com

María Paulina Cogollo Anaya, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana

  • Law student at Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Seccional Montería. paulinacogollo@outlook.es

References

Aponte, A. F. (2014). Compilador: González, F. Armar la Hacienda: territorio, poder y conflicto en Córdoba, 1958-2012. En Territorio y Conflicto en la Costa Caribe (pp. 99-223). Bogotá: Cinep-Caribe.

Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. (1991). Constitución Política de Colombia. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional de Colombia. Recuperado de https://www.ramajudicial.gov.co/documents/10228/1547471/CONSTITUCION-Interiores.pdf

Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica. (2009). El Despojo de tierras y territorios. Aproximación conceptual. Recuperado de http://www.centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/informes/publicaciones-por-ano/2009/el-despojo-de-tierras-y-territorios-aproximacion-conceptual

Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica. (2013). ¡BASTA YA! Colombia: Memorias de guerra y dignidad. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional. Recuperado de http://www.centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/descargas/informes2013/bastaYa/basta-ya-colombia-memorias-de-guerra-y-dignidad-2016.pdf

CINEP/ Programa por la Paz. (Marzo de 2016). Tierra y territorio en el departamento de Córdoba en el escenario del posconflicto. Recuperado de https://www.cinep.org.co/publicaciones/PDFS/20160301.tierra_territorio_cordoba.pdf

Colombia. Congreso de la República. (1959). Ley 201. Bogotá: Diario Oficial No. 30147 de 30 de diciembre de 1959.

Colombia. Congreso de la Republica. (1997). Ley 387. Bogotá: Diario Oficial No. 43.091 de 18 de Julio de 1997

Colombia. Congreso de la República. (2011). Ley 1448. Bogotá: Diario Oficial No. 48.096 de 10 de junio de 2011.

Colombia. Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Antioquia. (2014). Sentencia Rad. 004 - 2013, 230013121001-2013-00004-00. Medellín: Sala Especializada en Restitución de Tierras de 13 de febrero de 2014.

Colombia. Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Antioquia. (2016). Sentencia Rad. 009 - 2013, 230013121002-2013-00009-00. Medellín: Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Antioquia, Sala Especializado en Restitución de Tierras de 9 de junio de 2016.

Dávila, J. (2018). A land of lawyers, experts and “men without land”: the politics of land restitution and the techno-legal production of “dispossessed people” in Colombia. (Tesis de doctorado). Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

Martínez, C. y Pérez, A. (2012). La restitución de tierras en Colombia expectativas y retos Prolegómenos. Derechos y Valores, 15(29), 111-127. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/876/87625419008.pdf

Real Academia Española. (2018). Despojar. En Diccionario de la Lengua Española. Recuperado de https://dle.rae.es/?id=DO2oYrf

Reichardt, C. S. y Cook, T. D. (Ed.). (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Unidad Administrativa Especial de Gestión de Restitución de Tierras Despojadas. (2018). Memorias de la restitución: lecciones aprendidas y metodologías para restituir tierras y territorios en Colombia. Bogotá D.C: dígitos y Diseños Industriales Graficas S.A.S.

Unidad de Restitución de Tierras. (2017). Informe de Gestión 2017- Unidad Administrativa especial de gestión de restitución de tierras despojadas. Recuperado de https://www.restitucion-detierras.gov.co/documents/10184/698900/Informe+de+Gesti%C3%B3n+2017+Definitivo.pdf/21b930b5-5b6b-4c15-8b90-cd4b91e1af67

Uprimny-Yepes, R. y Sánchez, N. C. (2010). Los dilemas de la restitución de tierras en Colombia, Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 12(2), 305-342. Recuperado de https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/sociojuridicos/article/viewFile/1373/1263

How to Cite

Orozco Poveda, D., Castaño Maza, M. M. ., & Cogollo Anaya, M. P. (2021). Analysis of the materialization of the land restitution judgments in the city of Montería. Nuevo Derecho, 17(28), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25057/2500672X.1355

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-31

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 28 (2021): January - June

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Nuevo Derecho

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors should declare that the article is an original work that has not been totally or partially published in any print or electronic media, which has not been submitted simultaneously to another publication and that is not currently under evaluation in another publication. On the other hand, I leave (we) evidence that the statements made therein are the sole responsibility of the / the authors / is.

All data and references to already published material are properly identified with their respective credit and included in the bibliographical notes and appointments that stand out as such and, in cases that require it, I have the proper authorizations for those with the respective rights; in case of any dispute or claim relating to intellectual property rights, we take responsibility exonerating responsibility to Nuevo Derecho.

If the article is approved for publication, the authors transfer the copyright to the journal New law to publish, distribute electronic copies and included in indexing services, directories or databases of national and international data on Open Access under the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial (CC bY-NC-SA) by which the authors retain their copyrights and allow them to others copy and distribute your work provided they recognize the corresponding authorship and the work is not used for purposes commercial.

Therefore, new law does not retain the rights to reproduce or copy (copyright), so the authors will have the final versions, to disseminate them in institutional repositories, personal blogs or any other electronic or print media, with the sole condition to make mention of the original source of publication, in this case Nuevo Derecho.

Altmetric

Crossref Cited-by logo
1 Cites in Crossref to date
Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views