Static analysis of Judgment T 366 of 2019: on the protection of the fundamental rights of children and adolescents in the face of the hegemonic perspective of discriminatory stereotypes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25057/2500672X.1411Keywords:
Fundamental Rights, Constitutional Court, Rule of Law, Constitutional SupremacyAbstract
This article presents the hermeneutical analysis of a judgment of protection of the Constitutional Court of Colombia that deals with the problem of discriminatory acts derived from gender exclusion that entail violation of the fundamental rights of children and adolescents. The text starts from a research methodology that seeks to make a static analysis of the sentence in question, and proposes a study of a problem developed by the competent body with different reflection approaches.
Author Biographies
John Restrepo, Universidad de medellin. Colombia
- Lawyer and political scientist
- Master in Philosophy, Universidad de Antioquia. Colombia
- Doctor in Law, Universidad de Medellín. Colombia
- Professor at the Law School of the Universidad de Medellín.
- jfrestr1@gmail.com
Yelitza Sucre, Universidad Católica Luis Amigó. Colombia
- Lawyer
- Candidate for a Master's Degree in Law, Universidad Católica Luis Amigó. Colombia
- ysucre@funlam.edu.co
References
Alfaro, Élida. (2010). Las mujeres y el deporte: Evolución y situación actual. Seminario Permanente Mujer y Deporte. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. https://www.munideporte.com/imagenes/documentacion/ficheros/20100805132024Elida%20Alfaro.pdf
Colombia. Corte Constitucional. (1992, 17 de julio). Sentencia T-466 (Ciro Angarita Barón, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1992/t-466-92.htm
Colombia. Corte Constitucional. (1993, 14 de enero). Sentencia C-005 (Ciro Angarita Barón, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1993/C-005-93.htm
Colombia. Corte Constitucional. (1994, 28 de enero). Sentencia T-029 (Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1994/T-029-94.htm
Colombia. Corte Constitucional. (1996, 15 de mayo). Sentencia T-215 (Fabio Morón Díaz, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/1996/T-215-96.htm
Colombia. Corte Constitucional. (2003, 3 de junio). Sentencia C-449 (Álvaro Tafur Galvis, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2003/c-449-03.htm
Colombia. Corte Constitucional. (2014, 26 de junio). Sentencia T-404 (Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2014/T-404-14.htm
Colombia. Corte Constitucional. (2017, 23 de febrero). Sentencia T-117 (Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2017/T-117-17.htm
Colombia. Corte Constitucional. (2019a, 13 de agosto). Sentencia T-366 (José Fernando Reyes Cuartas, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2019/T-366-19.htm
Colombia. Corte Constitucional. (2019b, 31 de enero). Sentencia SU-037 (Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez, M. P.). https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2019/SU037-19.htm
Lamas, Marta. (1996). La antropología feminista y la categoría género. En El género: La construcción cultural de la diferencia sexual, (pp. 97-125). Programa Universitario de Estudios de Genero-Editorial Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
Moreno, Monserrat. (1986). Cómo se enseña a ser niña. EL sexismo en la escuela. Editorial Icaria.
Organización de las Naciones Unidas. (1978). Carta Internacional de la Educación Física y el Deporte. París, Francia.
Perú. Defensoría del Pueblo. (2009). El amicus curiae: ¿qué es y para qué sirve? Jurisprudencia y labor de la Defensoría del Pueblo. Serie Documentos Defensoriales- Documento N° 8. Lima, Perú. Depósito Legal en la Biblioteca Nacional del Perú Nº 2009–15028. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/26654.pdf
Unicef. (1989). Convención Internacional sobre los Derechos del Niño. Madrid, España. https://www.un.org/es/events/childrenday/pdf/derechos.pdf
How to Cite
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Nuevo Derecho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors should declare that the article is an original work that has not been totally or partially published in any print or electronic media, which has not been submitted simultaneously to another publication and that is not currently under evaluation in another publication. On the other hand, I leave (we) evidence that the statements made therein are the sole responsibility of the / the authors / is.
All data and references to already published material are properly identified with their respective credit and included in the bibliographical notes and appointments that stand out as such and, in cases that require it, I have the proper authorizations for those with the respective rights; in case of any dispute or claim relating to intellectual property rights, we take responsibility exonerating responsibility to Nuevo Derecho.
If the article is approved for publication, the authors transfer the copyright to the journal New law to publish, distribute electronic copies and included in indexing services, directories or databases of national and international data on Open Access under the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial (CC bY-NC-SA) by which the authors retain their copyrights and allow them to others copy and distribute your work provided they recognize the corresponding authorship and the work is not used for purposes commercial.
Therefore, new law does not retain the rights to reproduce or copy (copyright), so the authors will have the final versions, to disseminate them in institutional repositories, personal blogs or any other electronic or print media, with the sole condition to make mention of the original source of publication, in this case Nuevo Derecho.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
