Parrhesía y compromiso discursivo ciudadano: La paradoja de Sócrates y la diferencia del coraje de la verdad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25057/2500672X.396Keywords:
parrhesía, persona, veridicción, discurso, homología, compromisoAbstract
Este artículo explora el carácter discursivo de la parrhesía y su veridicción, su dimensión éticoestética, el problema de la formalidad lógica de la verdad y siete rasgos desde su perspectiva discursiva. Resalta la función de la parrhesía como homología y plantea la inversión participativa del discurso del parrhesiasta entendido como el afirmador de la verdad.
References
Castoriadis, C. (2012). La ciudad y las leyes. Buenos Aires: FCE.
Chatelet, Francois. (1995). El pensamiento de Platon. Madrid: Labor
Dworkin, R. (2010). Justice for hedgehogs. London, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Foucault, M. (2010). El coraje de la verdad. Buenos Aires: FCE.
Foucault, M. (2009). El gobierno de sí y de los otros. Buenos Aires: FCE.
Gula, R. (2007). Nonsense. Mount Jackson: Axios Press.
Nehamas, A. (2005). El arte de vivir. Reflexiones socráticas de Platón a Foucault. Madrid: Pre-textos.
Platón. (1992) .Diálogos. Trad. J. Cogen Ruiz. Madrid: Gredos.
Przeworski, A. (2010). Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government. New York: Cambridge.
Przeworski, A. (2012). ¿Qué esperar de la democracia? Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Sandel. (2009). Justice. What’s the right thing to do? New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.
How to Cite
Downloads
Languages:
esDownloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors should declare that the article is an original work that has not been totally or partially published in any print or electronic media, which has not been submitted simultaneously to another publication and that is not currently under evaluation in another publication. On the other hand, I leave (we) evidence that the statements made therein are the sole responsibility of the / the authors / is.
All data and references to already published material are properly identified with their respective credit and included in the bibliographical notes and appointments that stand out as such and, in cases that require it, I have the proper authorizations for those with the respective rights; in case of any dispute or claim relating to intellectual property rights, we take responsibility exonerating responsibility to Nuevo Derecho.
If the article is approved for publication, the authors transfer the copyright to the journal New law to publish, distribute electronic copies and included in indexing services, directories or databases of national and international data on Open Access under the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution-Noncommercial (CC bY-NC-SA) by which the authors retain their copyrights and allow them to others copy and distribute your work provided they recognize the corresponding authorship and the work is not used for purposes commercial.
Therefore, new law does not retain the rights to reproduce or copy (copyright), so the authors will have the final versions, to disseminate them in institutional repositories, personal blogs or any other electronic or print media, with the sole condition to make mention of the original source of publication, in this case Nuevo Derecho.
Article metrics | |
---|---|
Abstract views | |
Galley vies | |
PDF Views | |
HTML views | |
Other views |