Construction and validation of the scale of engagement to school tasks in classes for the students of the primary level of education

Appleton, J., Christenson, S., Furlong, M. (2008). Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5): 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303

Chistenson, S. Reschly, A., Wylie, C. (2012). Preface. En S. Chistenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Edits.). Handbook Research on Student Engagement (pp. V-IX). New York: Springer.

Cuevas, R., Sánchez-Oliva, D., Fernández-Bustos, J. G. (2016). Adaptación y validación de la Escala de compromiso agéntico al contexto educativo español. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 33(2), 135-142. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=243056044005

Eccles, J., Adler, T., Futterman, R., Goff, S., Kaczala, C., Meece, J.,

Midglay, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. En J. Spence (ed.) Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

Fernández Pulido, R. (2008). Modelos de medida y análisis factorial confirmatorio. En M., Verdugo, M. Crespo, M. Badía & B. Arias (Coord). Metodología en la investigación sobre discapacidad. Introducción al uso de las ecuaciones estructurales, (pp. 29-41). Salamanca: Publicaciones del INICO.

Finn, J. (1993). School engagement & student at risk. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, Departmnet of Education. Recuperado http://nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93470a.pdf

Fredricks, J., McColskey, W. (2012). The Measurement of Student Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self-report Instruments. En S. Chistenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Edits.). Handbook Research on Student Engagement (pp. 763-782). New York: Springer.

Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002

Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., Meli, J., Mordica, J., Montrosse, B., Mooney, K. (2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: a description of 21 instruments. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast. Recuperado http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs

Fredriscks, J., Blumenfeld, O. & Paris, A. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the concept state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74 (1): 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Gónzalez. N., Abad, J., Lèvy, J.P. (2006). Normalidad y otros supuestos en análisis de covarianzas. En J. Lévy. (Edit.): Modelización con estructuras de covarianzas (pp. 31-57). La Coruña: Netbiblo.

Greene, B. A. (2015). Measuring Cognitive Engagement with Self-Report Scales: Reflections from over 20 years of research. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 14–30. Recuperado http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.989230

Hart, S., Stewart, K., Jimerson, S. (2011). The Student Engagement in Schools Questionnaire (SESQ) and the Teacher Engagement Report Form-New (TERF-N): Examining the Preliminary Evidence. Contemporary School Psychology, 15: 67-79. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03340964

Kong, Q., Wong N., Lam, C. (2003). Student engagement in mathematics: Development of instrument and validation of construct. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15 (1): 4-21. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03217366

Krueger, R.F., Kling, K.C. (2000). Self-report. En A.E. Kazdin (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Psychology, 7 (pp. 220-224). New York: Oxford University Press

Lester, D. (2013). A Review of the Student Engagement Literature. Focus on Colleges, Universities and Schools, 7 (1). Recuperado http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Lester,%20Derek%20A%20Review%20of%20the%20Student%20Engagement%20Literature%20FOCUS%20V7%20N1%202013.pdf

Marsch, H., Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis to the Study of Self-Concept. First- and Higher Order Factor Models and Their Invariance Across Groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562-582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562

Newmann, F. M. (1986). Priorities for the future: Toward a common agenda. Social Education, 50(4): 240–250. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ335096

Newmann, F., Wehlage, G., Lamborn, S. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. En D. M., Newmann (ed.). Student engagement and achievement in american secondary schools (pp. 11-39). New York: Teachers College Press.

Orgaz Baz, B. (2008). Introducción a la metodología SEM: conceptos y propósitos fundamentales. En M., Verdugo, M. Crespo, M. Badía & B. Arias (Coord). Metodología en la investigación sobre discapacidad. Introducción al uso de las ecuaciones estructurales, (pp. 14-28). Salamanca: Publicaciones del INICO.

Reeve, J. (2013). How Students Create Motivationally Supportive Learning Environments for Themselves: The Concept of Agentic Engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105 (3): 579–595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032690

Reschly, A., Christenson, S. (2012). Jingle, Jangle, and Conceptual Hazines: Evolutions and Future Direction of the Egaggement Construct. En S. Chistenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Edits.). Handbook Research on Student Engagement (pp. 3-19). New York: Springer.

Rigo, D. (2017). Docentes, tareas y alumnos en la definición del compromiso: investigando el aula de nivel primario de educación. Educação em Revista, 33: 1-24. Recuperado http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-4698154275

Rigo, D., Donolo, D. (2014). Entre pupitres y pizarrones. Retos en educación primaria: el aprendizaje con compromiso. Educatio Siglo XXI, 32 (2): 59-80 59. Recuperado http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/j/202161

Ruiz, M., Pardo, A., San Martín, R. (2010). Modelos de educaciones estructurales. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 34-45.

Shernoff, D., Kelly, S., Tonks. S., Anderson, B., Cavanagh, R., Sinha, S., Abdi, B. (2016). Student engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 43: 52-60. Recuperado https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.12.003

Sperling, A., Ramsay, C., Reeves, P., Follmer, D., Richmond, A. (2016). Supporting students’ knowledge construction and self-regulation through the use of elaborative processing strategies. Middle School Journal, 47 (3): 25-32. Recuperado http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2015.1135099

Sperling, R., Howard, B., Miller L., Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of Children’s Knowledge and Regulation of Cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27: 51–79. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1091

Toll, K., Drefs, M., Lock, J. (2016). Measuring cognitive engagement. The Canadian Journal for Teacher Research. Recuperado https://www.teacherresearch.ca/search?text=toll

Zapata Rotundo, G., Canet Giner, T. (2008). Propuesta metodológica para la construcción de escalas de medición a partir de una aplicación empírica. Revista Electrónica Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 8 (2): 1-26. Recuperado http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44713044004